Re: the Trump Jr email bs
There is no collusion. Unless one attempts to argue that Hillary had a legal right to be president. This differs from the legal qualification to be president (that is, to run for the office). The legal right to be president attaches to whoever wins the office.
The image above is the disambiguation definition provided by the ever-so-reliable Wikipedia (at least the left thinks it is!) and even the thesaurus entries, good for lateral connections, are a stretch to what the media are attempting to portray. Check it out below.
One more thing, in this regard, is a private individual who is a Russian national the same as the Russian government? This is relevant because the most damaging thing in the email is
wherein Goldstone is relaying, at best, third-hand information (Aras-Emin-Goldstone) that a Crown prosecutor, a position that does not exist in Russia, wanted to share some official Russian documents.
This would be damaging as it makes out that a Russian government official is initiating the meeting via the intermediary. The doubt is raised by the ASSUMED Russian goverment support of the Trump candidacy. Talk about begging the question!
Attempting to rehabilitate Goldstone, supporters assert that Goldstone inadvertently “garbled” the titles when attempting to transliterate the positions across national definitions. I do not buy this.
As made clear by the very next sentence, this is an attempt to curry favour with MrTrump, regardless of the outcome of the 2016 election.
Having read through the entire email thread posted by Trump Jr it is pretty clear that the meeting was actually scheduled and the scheduling of which was openly negotiated. Doesn’t seem very secretive to me, nor was it illegal.